Microsoft, LinkedIn, and all that…

Microsoft bought LinkedIn for US$26.2 billion. The basic question everyone is asking: Why?

One possible answer: to spruce up enterprise social services. After its Yammer acquisition, LinkedIn adds to its enterprise social services ecosystem.

One more thought: acqui-hiring? LinkedIn has data; Microsoft has the software capability to mine it. LinkedIn was not getting anywhere with its wobbling model and volatile market valuation. Microsoft has the capability to give it the impetus it needs to stabilise and scale.

But that high an amount? Isn’t it too high, even for 400million professional users? But then, the tech environment has always been plagued by seemingly bizarre acquisitions that don’t make any sense right off the bat. Cases in point: Facebook bought Whatsapp for US$19 billion when the latter wasn’t even making any money; Dell bought (ongoing) EMC for US$67 billion to form a monopoly in the hardware and infrastructure market.

Coming back to the point, Microsoft’s acquisition of LinkedIn justified? To me, the price is way too steep. What does LinkedIn stand to gain?

  • Microsoft’s deep pockets
  • Infrastructure and resources
  • Ecosystem of cloud platforms
  • Ready-to-use plug-and-play software solutions
  • Sales teams with proven expertise

But what about Microsoft? What do they have to gain?

  • 400million user base
  • Established revenue model in the recruitment function
  • Integration with existing enterprise social and professional networks
  • Bundled solutioning with Dynamics CRM and Azure cloud

Nothing major though. Any glaring whitespace filled? Not really.

All in all, Microsoft just seems to be creating the foundational ecosystem required to compete in a hyper-c0mpetitive enterprise landscape. Apple (with SAP, Twitter, and IBM) is getting somewhere, Facebook has its own platform, and Google & Amazon have captured a large share of the enterprise cloud market. Microsoft had to do something. Is LinkedIn the solution? Seems unlikely, given Microsoft’s history with Nokia…

Even Weiner and Hoffman must be silently thinking – Please don’t do a Nokia with us.


3 thoughts on “Microsoft, LinkedIn, and all that…

  1. Sid,

    Cannot move on without a comment regarding this. The $26.2 Billion can be, to most part, attributed to the monopoly of LinkedIn the professional network space. When I try to sell an organization like LinkedIn, I would definitely pitch the stronghold we have in this segment. In addition, LinkedIn in itself is a really mature organization and made all the grown-up choices in acquiring smaller products like, Slideshare, Pulse. They’ve even got celebrities on their network.

    However, when I look at it closely – Microsoft onboarded a huge liability. LinkedIn has been plagued by lawsuits and complaints regarding their security. Heck, even I was part of their historic class action settlement last year. Although that paid only me a few $$$ after dividing over the claimants, that’s whole another discussion point. They’ve at least had two distinct incidents in the past with security violation, which technically opens them up to a bunch of potential lawsuits. All this should have brought that $26.2 Bn down, but who am I to judge.

    Microsoft’s pretty famous for their 90s internal motto – Embrace, Extend and Extinguish. Has their leadership moved away from this? The Nokia saga said otherwise. Would they do the same thing for LinkedIn? I’m just curious on Jeff Weiner’s decision to accept this offer rather than building this one of a kind enterprise.



    • Yes I totally get that JK. It’s all obvious though. I mean, is your point that 26 billion is justified? Or that MSFT should have paid less? Or that Weiner didn’t think it through?


    • Pricing is always a function of market dominance, I get that. But 8.7x sales is insane, even for MSFT. LinkedIn’s security vulnerability would have been on their minds, but MSFT isn’t a beacon of security either. Moreover, I’m sure MSFT has good plans for LNKD, quite unlike Nokia…


Please honour me with your opinion on this...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s